This one’s a long one. Because I was bored and I needed to let most of this out. Since I do not have a dummy to talk to (nor do I really desire one) or you know, a real live person, I shall type. And people can read it if they want.
So. Today I went for a walk (everyone else was out of the house), and then sat down in this place that kind of resembles a park/playground and I read. I think it’s good I went for a walk today – I normally get my exercise from walking the however many kilometres to and from school from the bus stops I get off at. It’s also good cause I guess I needed to walk some stuff off, and have the wind blow in my face and get away from my computer for a bit. Exercise is also one of the three components I (or Miss A or other people I’ve told) watch out for because it could make an episode worse or tell me that I may be slipping into one. The others are sleep (ing well) and eat (ing well).
On the subject of those three components, I haven’t been really eating all that well in the past few days. I know I have to eat – God knows how I survived that week in Hubei barely eating anything because everything to eat was too oily/way too spicy/indigestible. It’s just that when I make myself eat, it reminds me of why I didn’t want to eat in the first place. Which is confusing. And just plain bad.
I tried to do chem study today. Obviously that failed – I probably read half a one note page and then gave up. I.e. playing WoG/Peggle/Bejeweled/watching episodes of the West Wing. Fun, is it not? I really need to get out on Saturdays. Or just every second day of the holidays, probably. It’s not that I hate my house (a small portion may be to get away from my parent(s), depending on what day it is), it’s just I hate being cooped up at home. [Cue thoughts about domesticity and women, leading to world literature. Sigh.]
I should do some EE tonight or tomorrow, seeing as though the only EE-exclusive days we’re going to have are next week. Which just slightly fails. Hopefully I’ll be able to get some useful stuff done – though it’s dumb because there are only three music EE students… and I know for a fact Brendan is one of the most laziest people on Earth (no offence there), and I really don’t know much about Rudolf’s work ethic but they did both fail their music plans last term, so… It will be interesting. I’ll probably end up on my lonesome somewhere surrounded by books doing my own work. Which really wouldn’t be half bad. I’m still deciding on whether or not being away from my friends (most of whom are doing English/Psychology/History EEs) in the social sciences (or otherwise) library/ies is a good thing or not.
All in all, today’s been another pretty bipolar day. I was really, really tired this morning. And pissed. And thinking about death and all that ugly stuff. Now I’m not too bad… I’m still not happy though. Miles off. (Heh. The West Wing. Anyway.) You know, I wish there were certain moments in a day – like an hour or so? where people, wherever they were, whatever they were doing, whatever they were feeling that day, would just be happy. It would make every day, and life, worth living for, I think.
I hate myself like this – I guess it just means I have a whole crapload more thinking and brain sorting to do. Which again, will be fun, because those are two of my favourite hobbies. Though. I did nearly get to the bottom of the whole D breakup thing – whoever told me that things would be clearer after a few weeks or so was right. So these are the conclusions I have drawn. (Chem/physics/English much?)
We were into each other, but not very, very much. Looking back, after we broke up… I think I didn’t miss him as much as I missed the idea of him. And since that wasn’t clear enough, I spent another day thinking about how to describe this ‘idea’ concept theme (more!English references) whatever. It’s belonging. A sense of belonging… I think that explains it. Anyway. There was probably some kind of honeymoon period (as they call it), but it kind of disintegrated. I think. Because… he didn’t understand everything. He tried to ‘fix’ things for me, without comprehending what A, he was trying to fix, and B, how to exactly fix it. And then he got all annoyed when I tried to help him.
I’m a really messed up person, I guess. I promised myself toward the end of last year that by the end of this year, I would fix everything. Obviously, that hasn’t happened… but there are certain things and certain people who give me hope. Who make me smile and laugh and cry, who understand, really, and who I can see the shining light of recovery through. I now know it will take quite a bit longer than a year to work through everything, and to work through myself. I don’t want to give up, even though there are days (more often than not) where I’m barely hanging on. I have to keep reminding myself to live for these things and these people, that hope and strength are two of the very few weapons and shields I have left.
Finally. I leave the scarce number of people who read my blog (and the even scarcer who will read the whole thing) with my thinking aloud ToK notes I did last night. Have fun, peoples.
OTHER PERTINENT BITS AND PIECES
• Analysis of information & facts, NOT DESCRIPTION. (Like English. Yes.)
• Read criteria. (Again like English. And EE. HOT DAMN.) FOLLOW THE FREAKING CRITERIA.
• Exploration of issue = presenting different points of view, even if they are contradictory
• Try to reconcile different points of view/explain precisely why the incompatibility
• Do not have to choose one point of view as ‘correct’, but the ‘so there are different points of view all of which are equally valid’ approach should be avoided. (Unlike the situational/contingency leadership crap in business.)
• Abstract ToK principles are good. Despite their name.
• Try and see the implications of these principles
• Perhaps use these implications to reflect on the validity of the principles
• EXAMPLE TIME: If you are considering the argument for the death penalty which states that murderers lose the right to life, the principle seems to be ‘an eye of an eye’. But you could ask ‘what do we do with a thief? Or a rapist?’ The answers to these questions may or may not lead to a reformulation of the principle.
• Structure of presentation = IMPORTANT. (More English similarities).
• State explicitly the problems knowledge that are being analysed
• Retains clarity. Not employees.
• In the conclusion try to summarise (very briefly – one or two sentences) what you have said, and try to end with a forward-looking view. The future is bright and sunny. EMBRACE IT, CHILDREN.
• May be a summary of the main principles you have identified or some issues which have arisen and which have not been answered
• Do not just reiterate your arguments (ENGLISH. BUT MORE.)
• The end should ‘feel’ like a conclusion and not just be a ‘well that’s it’. (Like sex. Or something.)
• ORIGINAL THINKING = IMPORTANT. As well. Yes. This really shouldn't be a problem since our Opti-Minds presentation consisted of us poking and making Zibb make up random stories until we heard one we liked.
• I do think this is it. For the moment.